Ultra 5 134U vs Celeron 667

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 134U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated950
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-U
Architecture codenameTimnaMeteor Lake-U (2023)
Release dateno data14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 134U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads114
Base clock speedno data0.7 GHz
Boost clock speed0.67 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache32 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache128 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography180 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size129 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 134U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket370SFCBGA2551
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 134U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 134U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 134U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 134U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel i752Intel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.75 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 134U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 134U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 134U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 134U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data8
PCI supportno data4.0 and 3.0

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 14
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 9 Watt

Ultra 5 134U has 1100% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 134U. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron 667 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 134U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 667 and Core Ultra 5 134U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 667
Celeron 667
Intel Core Ultra 5 134U
Core Ultra 5 134U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 667 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 5 134U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 667 or Core Ultra 5 134U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.