Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Celeron 6305

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.35
Ryzen 9 7845HX
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 55 Watt
29.57
+2090%

Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms Celeron 6305 by a whopping 2090% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 7845HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2232156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-U (2020)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 7845HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache160 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFinCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 7845HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1449FL1
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 7845HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
StatusDiscontinuedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 7845HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 7845HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 7845HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon 610M
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 7845HX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 7845HX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 7845HX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 7845HX.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 6305 1.35
Ryzen 9 7845HX 29.57
+2090%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 6305 2075
Ryzen 9 7845HX 45526
+2094%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 6305 750
Ryzen 9 7845HX 2640
+252%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 6305 1259
Ryzen 9 7845HX 13730
+991%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron 6305 161
Ryzen 9 7845HX 4320
+2582%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron 6305 84
Ryzen 9 7845HX 295
+251%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 29.57
Recency 1 September 2020 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 55 Watt

Celeron 6305 has 266.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7845HX, on the other hand, has a 2090.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

The Ryzen 9 7845HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 6305 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 7845HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
Ryzen 9 7845HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 144 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 248 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7845HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6305 or Ryzen 9 7845HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.