Ryzen 9 5900H vs Celeron 6305
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 5900H outperforms Celeron 6305 by a whopping 892% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 5900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2257 | 582 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Tiger Lake | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | 8.24 | 27.22 |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake-U (2020) | Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) |
| Release date | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) | 7 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 5900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm SuperFin | 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 5900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 5900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 5900H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| SGX | - | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 5900H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 5900H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® Processors | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.25 GHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 48 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 5900H integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 4 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 5900H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680x4320@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 5900H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.33 | 13.19 |
| Recency | 1 September 2020 | 7 January 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron 6305 has 200% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 5900H, on the other hand, has a 891.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 9 5900H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 6305 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 9 5900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
