Ryzen 5 5600H vs Celeron 6305

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.35
Ryzen 5 5600H
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
11.00
+715%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by a whopping 715% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 5 5600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2148665
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-UCezanne-H (Zen 3)
Release date1 September 2020 (3 years ago)7 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 5 5600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache160 KB384 KB
L2 cache2.5 MB3 MB
L3 cache4 MB16 MB
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 5 5600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1449FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 5 5600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 5 5600H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 5 5600H are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 5 5600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 5 5600H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 5 5600H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 5 5600H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 6305 1.35
Ryzen 5 5600H 11.00
+715%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 715% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 6305 2094
Ryzen 5 5600H 17014
+713%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 713% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 6305 750
Ryzen 5 5600H 1614
+115%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 115% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 6305 1250
Ryzen 5 5600H 5793
+363%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 363% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron 6305 3465
Ryzen 5 5600H 5817
+67.9%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 68% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron 6305 6611
Ryzen 5 5600H 34229
+418%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 418% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron 6305 39.12
Ryzen 5 5600H 6.58
+495%

Celeron 6305 outperforms Ryzen 5 5600H by 495% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron 6305 2
Ryzen 5 5600H 19
+868%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 868% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron 6305 161
Ryzen 5 5600H 1563
+871%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 871% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron 6305 84
Ryzen 5 5600H 223
+166%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 166% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron 6305 0.99
Ryzen 5 5600H 2.62
+165%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 165% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron 6305 0.9
Ryzen 5 5600H 7.4
+699%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 699% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron 6305 1210
Ryzen 5 5600H 7497
+520%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 520% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron 6305 11
Ryzen 5 5600H 95
+746%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 746% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron 6305 62
Ryzen 5 5600H 251
+306%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 6305 by 306% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 11.00
Recency 1 September 2020 7 January 2021
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

The Ryzen 5 5600H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 6305 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6305 and Ryzen 5 5600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
Ryzen 5 5600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 137 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4346 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6305 or Ryzen 5 5600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.