EPYC 9654 vs Celeron 6305

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads
1.36
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
78.94
+5704%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron 6305 by 5704% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Celeron 6305 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data10.10
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-UGenoa
Release date1 September 2020 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current priceno data$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

Celeron 6305 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache160 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6305 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1449SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6305 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 6305 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6305 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6305 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 6305 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 6305 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 6305 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6305 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 6305 1.36
EPYC 9654 78.94
+5704%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron 6305 by 5704% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 6305 2107
EPYC 9654 122091
+5695%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron 6305 by 5695% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 6305 746
EPYC 9654 1829
+145%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron 6305 by 145% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 6305 1248
EPYC 9654 18566
+1388%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron 6305 by 1388% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.36 78.94
Recency 1 September 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 6305 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 6305 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6305 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 131 vote

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 979 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6305 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.