i9-13900KS vs Celeron 6305

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.35
Core i9-13900KS
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
40.06
+2867%

Core i9-13900KS outperforms Celeron 6305 by a whopping 2867% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6305 and Core i9-13900KS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking223272
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.03
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-U (2020)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)12 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6305 and Core i9-13900KS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz5.8 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache160 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFinIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6305 and Core i9-13900KS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1449FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6305 and Core i9-13900KS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Celeron 6305 and Core i9-13900KS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6305 and Core i9-13900KS are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6305 and Core i9-13900KS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz1.65 GHz
Execution Units4832

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 6305 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 6305 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 6305 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112
OpenGL4.64.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6305 and Core i9-13900KS.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 6305 1.35
i9-13900KS 40.06
+2867%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 6305 2075
i9-13900KS 61667
+2872%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 6305 750
i9-13900KS 3141
+319%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 6305 1259
i9-13900KS 21805
+1632%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 40.06
Recency 1 September 2020 12 January 2023
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

Celeron 6305 has 900% lower power consumption.

i9-13900KS, on the other hand, has a 2867.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Core i9-13900KS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 6305 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 6305 is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900KS is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6305 and Core i9-13900KS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305
Intel Core i9-13900KS
Core i9-13900KS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 144 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 823 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6305 or Core i9-13900KS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.