Ultra 5 245K vs Celeron 6305

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.31
Core Ultra 5 245K
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.81
+2023%

Core Ultra 5 245K outperforms Celeron 6305 by a whopping 2023% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6305 and Core Ultra 5 245K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2276172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data79.15
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Power efficiency8.2621.05
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-U (2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6305 and Core Ultra 5 245K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data8
Threads214
Base clock speedno data4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/s159 MHz
L1 cache160 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6305 and Core Ultra 5 245K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1449FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6305 and Core Ultra 5 245K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron 6305 and Core Ultra 5 245K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6305 and Core Ultra 5 245K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6305 and Core Ultra 5 245K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size64 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz1.9 GHz
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 6305 and Core Ultra 5 245K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 6305 and Core Ultra 5 245K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hz4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hz8K @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 6305 and Core Ultra 5 245K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112
OpenGL4.64.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6305 and Core Ultra 5 245K.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 6305 1.31
Ultra 5 245K 27.81
+2023%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 6305 2080
Ultra 5 245K 44172
+2024%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron 6305 1198
Ultra 5 245K 17760
+1382%

Blender(-)

Celeron 6305 2834
+1984%
Ultra 5 245K 136

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron 6305 638
Ultra 5 245K 2224
+249%

7-Zip Single

Celeron 6305 2238
Ultra 5 245K 6477
+189%

7-Zip

Celeron 6305 4263
Ultra 5 245K 77921
+1728%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron 6305 101
Ultra 5 245K 346
+244%

CrossMark Overall

Celeron 6305 508
Ultra 5 245K 2245
+342%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 27.81
Recency 1 September 2020 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 2 14
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron 6305 has 733.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 245K, on the other hand, has a 2022.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 245K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 6305 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 6305 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 245K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6305 and Core Ultra 5 245K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Core Ultra 5 245K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 153 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 31 vote

Rate Core Ultra 5 245K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6305 or Core Ultra 5 245K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.