Celeron N5105 vs 6305

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.31
Celeron N5105
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
2.55
+94.7%

Celeron N5105 outperforms Celeron 6305 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6305 and Celeron N5105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22751748
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Power efficiency8.2624.13
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-U (2020)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6305 and Celeron N5105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache160 KBno data
L2 cache2.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6305 and Celeron N5105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1449FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6305 and Celeron N5105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Celeron 6305 and Celeron N5105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
Identity Protection-+
SGX--
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6305 and Celeron N5105 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6305 and Celeron N5105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz800 MHz
Execution Units4824

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 6305 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 6305 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 6305 and Celeron N5105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112
OpenGL4.64.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6305 and Celeron N5105.

PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 6305 1.31
Celeron N5105 2.55
+94.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 6305 2080
Celeron N5105 4055
+95%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 6305 750
+58.9%
Celeron N5105 472

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 6305 1264
Celeron N5105 1284
+1.6%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron 6305 161
Celeron N5105 368
+129%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron 6305 84
Celeron N5105 108
+28.8%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron 6305 1198
Celeron N5105 2080
+73.6%

Blender(-)

Celeron 6305 2834
+80.2%
Celeron N5105 1573

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron 6305 638
Celeron N5105 653
+2.4%

7-Zip Single

Celeron 6305 2238
Celeron N5105 3108
+38.9%

7-Zip

Celeron 6305 4263
Celeron N5105 11153
+162%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron 6305 101
Celeron N5105 134
+33.3%

CrossMark Overall

Celeron 6305 508
Celeron N5105 531
+4.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 2.55
Recency 1 September 2020 11 January 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron N5105 has a 94.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N5105 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 6305 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 6305 is a notebook processor while Celeron N5105 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6305 and Celeron N5105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305
Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 149 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 701 vote

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6305 or Celeron N5105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.