Xeon D-2798NX vs Celeron 6205
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 6205 and Xeon D-2798NX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Tiger Lake | no data |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake U (2020) | no data |
| Release date | 1 September 2020 (3 years ago) | 1 July 2022 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 6205 and Xeon D-2798NX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 30 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 6205 and Xeon D-2798NX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA1499 | FCBGA2579 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 126 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6205 and Xeon D-2798NX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Celeron 6205 and Xeon D-2798NX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6205 and Xeon D-2798NX are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6205 and Xeon D-2798NX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6205 and Xeon D-2798NX.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2020 | 1 July 2022 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 20 |
| Threads | 2 | 40 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 126 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron 6205 and Xeon D-2798NX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 6205 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2798NX is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6205 and Xeon D-2798NX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
