i3-N300 vs Celeron 6205
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 6205 and Core i3-N300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1184 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Tiger Lake | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 72.66 |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake U (2020) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $309 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 6205 and Core i3-N300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2/2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 2 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 6205 and Core i3-N300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1499 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6205 and Core i3-N300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 6205 and Core i3-N300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6205 and Core i3-N300 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6205 and Core i3-N300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) ( - 1250 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6205 and Core i3-N300.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 4.57 | 3.29 |
| Recency | 1 September 2020 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 7 Watt |
Celeron 6205 has 38.9% faster integrated GPU.
i3-N300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 114.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 6205 and Core i3-N300. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6205 and Core i3-N300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
