Ultra 9 285K vs Celeron 6205

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6205 and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.95
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Power efficiencyno data22.34
Architecture codenameTiger Lake U (2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)24 October 2024
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6205 and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5.7 GHz
L1 cache160 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6205 and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA14991851
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6205 and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Celeron 6205 and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6205 and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6205 and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUsArc Xe-2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6205 and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2020 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron 6205 has 733.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 6205 and Core Ultra 9 285K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 6205 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6205 and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6205
Celeron 6205
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 6205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 15 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6205 or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.