Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs Celeron 5305U
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 5305U and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | no data | Strix Halo (2025) |
| Release date | 1 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 5305U and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 4 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 5305U and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP11 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 5305U and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 5305U and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon 8050S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 5305U and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 April 2020 | 6 January 2025 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Celeron 5305U has 266.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 700% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 5305U and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 5305U and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
