i3-10105 vs Celeron 440

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 440 and Core i3-10105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1160
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.41
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data7.85
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Comet Lake-R (2021)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$40$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 440 and Core i3-10105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature60 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 440 and Core i3-10105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 440 and Core i3-10105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 440 and Core i3-10105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 440 and Core i3-10105 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 440 and Core i3-10105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 440 and Core i3-10105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 440 and Core i3-10105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 440 and Core i3-10105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 440 and Core i3-10105.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 440 368
i3-10105 8561
+2226%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 440 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i3-10105, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 440 and Core i3-10105. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 440 and Core i3-10105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 440
Celeron 440
Intel Core i3-10105
Core i3-10105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 58 votes

Rate Celeron 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 810 votes

Rate Core i3-10105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 440 or Core i3-10105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.