Ryzen 3 210 vs Celeron 4305UE
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 3 210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2471 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 6.71 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 1 October 2018 (6 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 3 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 137 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 20,900 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 3 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1528 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 3 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 3 210 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 3 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | AMD Radeon 740M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 3 210.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 14 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 1.89 | 8.25 |
| Recency | 1 October 2018 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Celeron 4305UE has 86.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 210, on the other hand, has 336.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 3 210. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
