EPYC 4484PX vs Celeron 3965U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3965U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.09
EPYC 4484PX
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
32.18
+2852%

EPYC 4484PX outperforms Celeron 3965U by a whopping 2852% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3965U and EPYC 4484PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2403126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.67
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency6.8825.38
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-U (2017)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3965U and EPYC 4484PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed2.2 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size98.7 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3965U and EPYC 4484PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1356,FPBGA1356AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3965U and EPYC 4484PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 3965U and EPYC 4484PX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3965U and EPYC 4484PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3965U and EPYC 4484PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 610AMD Radeon Graphics
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3965U and EPYC 4484PX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3965U and EPYC 4484PX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3965U and EPYC 4484PX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3965U and EPYC 4484PX.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3965U 1.09
EPYC 4484PX 32.18
+2852%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3965U 1732
EPYC 4484PX 51115
+2851%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 32.18
Integrated graphics card 1.85 1.98
Recency 3 January 2017 21 May 2024
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron 3965U has 700% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4484PX, on the other hand, has a 2852.3% higher aggregate performance score, 7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4484PX is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3965U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3965U is a notebook processor while EPYC 4484PX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3965U and EPYC 4484PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3965U
Celeron 3965U
AMD EPYC 4484PX
EPYC 4484PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 20 votes

Rate Celeron 3965U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate EPYC 4484PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3965U or EPYC 4484PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.