Core i3-330M vs Celeron 3965U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3965U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.14
+72.7%

Celeron 3965U outperforms Core i3-330M by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3965U and Core i3-330M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22922642
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i3
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-UArrandale (2010−2011)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$49
Current price$532 (5x MSRP)$54 (1.1x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3965U and Core i3-330M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.13 GHz
Bus supportno data2500 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size98.7 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA
Number of transistorsno data177+382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3965U and Core i3-330M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1356,FPBGA1356BGA1288,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3965U and Core i3-330M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMAno data+
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP-no data
Smart Response+no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron 3965U and Core i3-330M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3965U and Core i3-330M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3965U and Core i3-330M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/s17.1 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency900 MHz667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3965U and Core i3-330M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3965U and Core i3-330M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3965U and Core i3-330M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3965U and Core i3-330M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3965U 1.14
+72.7%
i3-330M 0.66

Celeron 3965U outperforms Core i3-330M by 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 3965U 1761
+72.6%
i3-330M 1020

Celeron 3965U outperforms Core i3-330M by 73% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 3965U 441
+60.4%
i3-330M 275

Celeron 3965U outperforms Core i3-330M by 60% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 3965U 780
+35.4%
i3-330M 576

Celeron 3965U outperforms Core i3-330M by 35% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 0.66
Recency 3 January 2017 10 January 2010
Threads 2 4
Cost $107 $49
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

The Celeron 3965U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-330M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3965U and Core i3-330M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3965U
Celeron 3965U
Intel Core i3-330M
Core i3-330M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 19 votes

Rate Celeron 3965U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 290 votes

Rate Core i3-330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3965U or Core i3-330M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.