Celeron J3455E vs 3965U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3965U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.00
Celeron J3455E
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.25
+25%

Celeron J3455E outperforms Celeron 3965U by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26582477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.825.28
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-U (2017)no data
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)1 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3965U and Celeron J3455E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size98.7 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3965U and Celeron J3455E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1356,FPBGA1356no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3965U and Celeron J3455E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+-

Security technologies

Celeron 3965U and Celeron J3455E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
MPX+-
Identity Protection-+
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3965U and Celeron J3455E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3965U and Celeron J3455E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610Intel HD Graphics 500
Max video memory32 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency900 MHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3965U and Celeron J3455E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3965U and Celeron J3455E integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3965U and Celeron J3455E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12+
OpenGL4.4+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3965U and Celeron J3455E.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes106

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 3965U 1.00
Celeron J3455E 1.25
+25%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 3965U 1753
Samples: 49
Celeron J3455E 2193
+25.1%
Samples: 10

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 3965U 449
+66.9%
Celeron J3455E 269

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 3965U 799
+0.4%
Celeron J3455E 796

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.00 1.25
Integrated graphics card 1.61 0.68
Recency 3 January 2017 1 July 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron 3965U has 136.8% faster integrated GPU.

Celeron J3455E, on the other hand, has a 25% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Intel Celeron J3455E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 3965U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3965U is a notebook processor while Celeron J3455E is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3965U
Celeron 3965U
Intel Celeron J3455E
Celeron J3455E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 24 votes

Rate Celeron 3965U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Celeron J3455E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 3965U and Celeron J3455E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.