Xeon W-10885M vs Celeron 3867U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3867U
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.95
Xeon W-10885M
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
10.15
+968%

Xeon W-10885M outperforms Celeron 3867U by a whopping 968% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3867U and Xeon W-10885M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2408710
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
SeriesIntel CeleronComet Lake
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date1 March 2019 (5 years ago)13 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$341 (3.2x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3867U and Xeon W-10885M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB512 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache2 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3867U and Xeon W-10885M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1356,FC-BGA1356FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3867U and Xeon W-10885M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP-+
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron 3867U and Xeon W-10885M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3867U and Xeon W-10885M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3867U and Xeon W-10885M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/s45.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610Intel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz1.25 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3867U and Xeon W-10885M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3867U and Xeon W-10885M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3867U and Xeon W-10885M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3867U and Xeon W-10885M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3867U 0.95
Xeon W-10885M 10.15
+968%

Xeon W-10885M outperforms Celeron 3867U by 968% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 3867U 1467
Xeon W-10885M 15700
+970%

Xeon W-10885M outperforms Celeron 3867U by 970% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 3867U 358
Xeon W-10885M 1577
+341%

Xeon W-10885M outperforms Celeron 3867U by 341% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 3867U 625
Xeon W-10885M 7106
+1037%

Xeon W-10885M outperforms Celeron 3867U by 1037% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron 3867U 134
Xeon W-10885M 1640
+1124%

Xeon W-10885M outperforms Celeron 3867U by 1124% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 10.15
Recency 1 March 2019 13 May 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

The Xeon W-10885M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3867U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3867U is a notebook processor while Xeon W-10885M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3867U and Xeon W-10885M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3867U
Celeron 3867U
Intel Xeon W-10885M
Xeon W-10885M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 20 votes

Rate Celeron 3867U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 38 votes

Rate Xeon W-10885M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3867U or Xeon W-10885M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.