EPYC 4464P vs Celeron 3867U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3867U
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.92
EPYC 4464P
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
30.54
+3220%

EPYC 4464P outperforms Celeron 3867U by a whopping 3220% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3867U and EPYC 4464P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2531134
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.03
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency5.8027.53
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date1 March 2019 (5 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3867U and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3867U and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1356,FC-BGA1356AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3867U and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 3867U and EPYC 4464P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3867U and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3867U and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 610AMD Radeon Graphics
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3867U and EPYC 4464P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3867U and EPYC 4464P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3867U and EPYC 4464P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3867U and EPYC 4464P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1228

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3867U 0.92
EPYC 4464P 30.54
+3220%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3867U 1467
EPYC 4464P 48518
+3207%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.92 30.54
Integrated graphics card 1.85 1.98
Recency 1 March 2019 21 May 2024
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 105 Watt

Celeron 3867U has 600% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4464P, on the other hand, has a 3219.6% higher aggregate performance score, 7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4464P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3867U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3867U is a notebook processor while EPYC 4464P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3867U and EPYC 4464P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3867U
Celeron 3867U
AMD EPYC 4464P
EPYC 4464P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 20 votes

Rate Celeron 3867U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3867U or EPYC 4464P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.