Xeon Gold 6414U vs Celeron 3865U

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3865U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.84
Xeon Gold 6414U
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
36.01
+4187%

Xeon Gold 6414U outperforms Celeron 3865U by a whopping 4187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3865U and Xeon Gold 6414U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2590100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data45.07
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency5.3013.62
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-U (2017)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$2,296

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3865U and Xeon Gold 6414U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)60 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size98.7 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3865U and Xeon Gold 6414U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1356,FPBGA1356FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3865U and Xeon Gold 6414U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 3865U and Xeon Gold 6414U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3865U and Xeon Gold 6414U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3865U and Xeon Gold 6414U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610no data
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3865U and Xeon Gold 6414U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3865U and Xeon Gold 6414U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3865U and Xeon Gold 6414U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3865U and Xeon Gold 6414U.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3865U 0.84
Xeon Gold 6414U 36.01
+4187%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3865U 1329
Xeon Gold 6414U 57200
+4204%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 36.01
Recency 3 January 2017 10 January 2023
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

Celeron 3865U has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6414U, on the other hand, has a 4186.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6414U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3865U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3865U is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6414U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3865U and Xeon Gold 6414U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3865U
Celeron 3865U
Intel Xeon Gold 6414U
Xeon Gold 6414U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 116 votes

Rate Celeron 3865U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6414U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3865U or Xeon Gold 6414U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.