Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Celeron 3215U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3215U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.68
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
51.97
+7543%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron 3215U by a whopping 7543% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking288938
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.50
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency4.3717.90
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 June 2015 (10 years ago)14 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$5,500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3215U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data27
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB256 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size82 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors1300 Million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3215U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 3215U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel Processors-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency850 MHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3215U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 3215U 0.68
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 51.97
+7543%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 3215U 1100
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 83563
+7497%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 3215U 329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 1578
+380%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 3215U 582
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 14066
+2317%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 51.97
Recency 1 June 2015 14 July 2020
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron 3215U has 1766.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, on the other hand, has a 7542.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 3215U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3215U is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3215U
Celeron 3215U
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 28 votes

Rate Celeron 3215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 826 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 3215U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.