Processor N200 vs Celeron 3215U
Aggregate performance score
Processor N200 outperforms Celeron 3215U by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 3215U and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2733 | 2119 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Power efficiency | 4.27 | 24.48 |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | 1 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $193 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 3215U and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1300 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 3215U and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3215U and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 3215U and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| OS Guard | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3215U and Processor N200 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3215U and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel Processors | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz) |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 850 MHz | no data |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3215U and Processor N200 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron 3215U and Processor N200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3215U and Processor N200.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.68 | 1.56 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 3.29 |
| Recency | 1 June 2015 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Processor N200 has a 129.4% higher aggregate performance score, 327.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.
The Processor N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3215U in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3215U and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
