Xeon W-3235 vs Celeron 2957U
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-3235 outperforms Celeron 2957U by a whopping 2898% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3042 | 496 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 15.40 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Xeon W |
| Power efficiency | 1.37 | 3.41 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 1 January 2014 (11 years ago) | 3 June 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $1,398 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2957U and Xeon W-3235 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 33 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 19.25 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2957U and Xeon W-3235 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2957U and Xeon W-3235. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| Smart Connect | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| FDI | - | no data |
| AMT | 9.5 | no data |
| Matrix Storage | - | no data |
| HD Audio | + | no data |
| RST | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 2957U and Xeon W-3235 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| OS Guard | - | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2957U and Xeon W-3235 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2957U and Xeon W-3235. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 140.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2957U and Xeon W-3235 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2957U and Xeon W-3235.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 10 | 64 |
| PCI support | - | no data |
| USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Integrated IDE | - | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | - | no data |
| UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.53 | 15.89 |
| Recency | 1 January 2014 | 3 June 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 180 Watt |
Celeron 2957U has 1100% lower power consumption.
Xeon W-3235, on the other hand, has a 2898.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon W-3235 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 2957U in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron 2957U is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3235 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
