EPYC 9654 vs Celeron 2957U

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron 2957U
2014
2 cores / 2 threads
0.56
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
78.96
+14000%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron 2957U by 14000% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26904
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data10.10
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Genoa
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$11,805
Current price$219 (2x MSRP)$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1168SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size16 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes10128
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 2957U 0.56
EPYC 9654 78.96
+14000%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron 2957U by 14000% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 2957U 860
EPYC 9654 122091
+14097%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron 2957U by 14097% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.56 78.96
Recency 1 January 2014 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Cost $107 $11805
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 2957U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 2957U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2957U
Celeron 2957U
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 66 votes

Rate Celeron 2957U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2957U or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.