Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Celeron 2955U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron 2955U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads
0.57
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019
32 cores / 64 threads
40.91
+7077%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron 2955U by a whopping 7077% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2955U and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking269654
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data24.19
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years ago)25 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999
Current price$197 $1675 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2955U and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus supportno data8 × 16 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)128 MB
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2955U and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1168TR4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2955U and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 2955U and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2955U and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2955U and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB256 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors-
Quick Sync Video--
Clear Video+-
Graphics max frequency1 GHz-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2955U and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2955U and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes10no data
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 2955U 0.57
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 40.91
+7077%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron 2955U by 7077% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 2955U 877
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 63273
+7115%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron 2955U by 7115% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 2955U 267
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 1637
+513%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron 2955U by 513% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 2955U 453
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 14008
+2992%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron 2955U by 2992% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 40.91
Recency 1 September 2013 25 November 2019
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 280 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 2955U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 2955U is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2955U and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2955U
Celeron 2955U
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 60 votes

Rate Celeron 2955U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 343 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2955U or Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.