Xeon Gold 6530 vs Celeron 220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 220 and Xeon Gold 6530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated48
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Emerald Rapids
Release dateOctober 2007 (16 years ago)1 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$387 no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 220 and Xeon Gold 6530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz4 GHz
Bus support533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB160 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size77 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 220 and Xeon Gold 6530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketPBGA479FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 220 and Xeon Gold 6530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron 220 and Xeon Gold 6530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 220 and Xeon Gold 6530 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 220 and Xeon Gold 6530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 220 and Xeon Gold 6530.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 220 209
Xeon Gold 6530 65533
+31256%

Xeon Gold 6530 outperforms Celeron 220 by 31256% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 32
Threads 1 64
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 270 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron 220 and Xeon Gold 6530. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 220 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6530 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 220 and Xeon Gold 6530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 220
Celeron 220
Intel Xeon Gold 6530
Xeon Gold 6530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 58 votes

Rate Celeron 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 220 or Xeon Gold 6530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.