UHD Graphics 630 vs Celeron 2.80
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 2.80 and UHD Graphics 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Gen9.5 |
| Release date | November 2003 (21 year ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2.80 and UHD Graphics 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 1 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 0.35 GHz |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm |
| Die size | 146 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 55 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2.80 and UHD Graphics 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.80 and UHD Graphics 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
UHD Graphics 630 has a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 2.80 and UHD Graphics 630. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron 2.80 is a desktop processor while UHD Graphics 630 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2.80 and UHD Graphics 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
