Athlon 64 4000+ (F3) vs Celeron 2.80
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3618 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.06 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Orleans (2007−2009) |
| Release date | November 2003 (22 years ago) | February 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2.80 and Athlon 64 4000+ (F3) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | 128K |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | 512K |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 146 mm2 | 103.1 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | 55 million | 154 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2.80 and Athlon 64 4000+ (F3) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 478 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 59 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2.80 and Athlon 64 4000+ (F3) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.80 and Athlon 64 4000+ (F3). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 59 Watt |
Athlon 64 4000+ (F3) has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 23.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 2.80 and AMD Athlon 64 4000+ (F3). We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
