Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Celeron 2.8 GHz
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 356 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | no data | 28.86 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Strix Point (2024−2025) |
| Release date | no data | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2.8 GHz and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 233 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2.8 GHz and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 52.8 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2.8 GHz and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2.8 GHz and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.8 GHz and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 890M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2.8 GHz and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 52 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, a 3150% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
