Athlon 64 3500+ EE vs Celeron 2.8 GHz
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Orleans (2007−2009) |
| Release date | no data | February 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2.8 GHz and Athlon 64 3500+ EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 183 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 154 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2.8 GHz and Athlon 64 3500+ EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 128 KB | 35 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 128 Watt | 35 Watt |
Athlon 64 3500+ EE has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 265.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz and AMD Athlon 64 3500+ EE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 2.8 GHz is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 3500+ EE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
