Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Celeron 2.70
General info
Comparing Celeron 2.70 and Ryzen Embedded V2546 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 669 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2001−2004) | Renoir (2020−2022) |
| Release date | September 2003 (20 years ago) | 10 November 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | $81 | no data |
Technical specs
Celeron 2.70 and Ryzen Embedded V2546 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.95 GHz |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 146 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 55 million | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2.70 and Ryzen Embedded V2546 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 478 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2.70 and Ryzen Embedded V2546. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2.70 and Ryzen Embedded V2546 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.70 and Ryzen Embedded V2546. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 68.269 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2.70 and Ryzen Embedded V2546.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen Embedded V2546 outperforms Celeron 2.70 by 10111% in Passmark.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 35 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron 2.70 and Ryzen Embedded V2546. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2.70 and Ryzen Embedded V2546, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
