Athlon 64 LE-1640B vs Celeron 2.30

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3652not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.05no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)Lima (2008−2009)
Release dateMarch 2003 (22 years ago)April 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2.30 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache8 KB128K
L2 cache128 KB512K
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm65 nm
Die size146 mm277 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors55 million122 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2.30 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket478AM2
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt45 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2.30 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.30 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2DDR2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 45 Watt

Athlon 64 LE-1640B has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 62.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 2.30 and AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640B. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2.30
Celeron 2.30
AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640B
Athlon 64 LE-1640B

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 8 votes

Rate Celeron 2.30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 LE-1640B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 2.30 and Athlon 64 LE-1640B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.