Ryzen 9 H 270 vs Celeron 2.20
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3704 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.05 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| Release date | November 2002 (23 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2.20 and Ryzen 9 H 270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | no data |
| Die size | 146 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 55 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2.20 and Ryzen 9 H 270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 45 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.20 and Ryzen 9 H 270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ryzen 9 H 270 has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and 62.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 2.20 and AMD Ryzen 9 H 270. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron 2.20 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 H 270 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
