Ryzen 7 3800X vs Celeron 2.0

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2.0 and Ryzen 7 3800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.80
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiencyno data13.13
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release dateSeptember 2002 (22 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2.0 and Ryzen 7 3800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache8 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache128 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB
Chip lithography130 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size146 mm2no data
Number of transistors55 million19,200 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2.0 and Ryzen 7 3800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket478AM4
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2.0 and Ryzen 7 3800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2.0 and Ryzen 7 3800X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.0 and Ryzen 7 3800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 105 Watt

Celeron 2.0 has 43.8% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 3800X, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 2.0 and Ryzen 7 3800X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2.0 and Ryzen 7 3800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2.0
Celeron 2.0
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Ryzen 7 3800X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Celeron 2.0 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1747 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2.0 or Ryzen 7 3800X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.