EPYC 7H12 vs Celeron 1047UE

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1047UE and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	37
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	22.10
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date	20 January 2013 (11 years ago)	18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$134	no data
Current price	no data	$1970

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1047UE and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads	2	128
Base clock speed	no data	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.4 GHz	3.3 GHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	96K (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Die size	118 mm2	192 mm2
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,400 million	4,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1047UE and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2 (Multiprocessor)
Socket	Intel BGA1023	TR4
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1047UE and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	no data	+
AVX	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1047UE and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

+

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1047UE and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1047UE and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size	no data	4 TiB
Max memory channels	no data	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support	no data	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	20 January 2013	18 September 2019
Physical cores	2	64
Threads	2	128
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	280 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1047UE and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---