Core i3-2365M vs Celeron 1037U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1037U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.65
+22.6%

Celeron 1037U outperforms i3-2365M by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1037U and Core i3-2365M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26612749
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i3
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date20 January 2013 (11 years ago)27 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$225
Current price$246 (2.9x MSRP)$319 (1.4x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1037U and Core i3-2365M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size118 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million624 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1037U and Core i3-2365M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1037U and Core i3-2365M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX
AES-NI--
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron 1037U and Core i3-2365M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Identity Protectionno data+
Anti-Theft-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1037U and Core i3-2365M are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1037U and Core i3-2365M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1037U and Core i3-2365M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVO++
CRT++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1037U and Core i3-2365M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1037U 0.65
+22.6%
i3-2365M 0.53

Celeron 1037U outperforms Core i3-2365M by 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 1037U 998
+21.4%
i3-2365M 822

Celeron 1037U outperforms Core i3-2365M by 21% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 1037U 311
+54%
i3-2365M 202

Celeron 1037U outperforms Core i3-2365M by 54% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 1037U 522
+20%
i3-2365M 435

Celeron 1037U outperforms Core i3-2365M by 20% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron 1037U 2500
+36.9%
i3-2365M 1826

Celeron 1037U outperforms Core i3-2365M by 37% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron 1037U 4824
+19.3%
i3-2365M 4044

Celeron 1037U outperforms Core i3-2365M by 19% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron 1037U 1903
+14.7%
i3-2365M 1659

Celeron 1037U outperforms Core i3-2365M by 15% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron 1037U 41.48
i3-2365M 36.7
+13%

Celeron 1037U outperforms Core i3-2365M by 13% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron 1037U 1
+9.7%
i3-2365M 1

Celeron 1037U outperforms Core i3-2365M by 10% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron 1037U 0.75
+33.9%
i3-2365M 0.56

Celeron 1037U outperforms Core i3-2365M by 34% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron 1037U 0.2
+23.1%
i3-2365M 0.1

Celeron 1037U outperforms Core i3-2365M by 23% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron 1037U 1276
i3-2365M 1437
+12.6%

Core i3-2365M outperforms Celeron 1037U by 13% in WinRAR 4.0.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 0.53
Recency 20 January 2013 27 June 2011
Threads 2 4
Cost $86 $225
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm

The Celeron 1037U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2365M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1037U and Core i3-2365M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1037U
Celeron 1037U
Intel Core i3-2365M
Core i3-2365M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 74 votes

Rate Celeron 1037U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 24 votes

Rate Core i3-2365M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1037U or Core i3-2365M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.