Ryzen 5 3600 vs Celeron 1020E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1020E
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.91
Ryzen 5 3600
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.48
+1162%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron 1020E by a whopping 1162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1020E and Ryzen 5 3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2438633
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data35.11
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date20 January 2013 (11 years ago)7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199
Current price$27 $163 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1020E and Ryzen 5 3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1020E and Ryzen 5 3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketG2 (988B)AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1020E and Ryzen 5 3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1020E and Ryzen 5 3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1020E and Ryzen 5 3600 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1020E and Ryzen 5 3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1020E 0.91
Ryzen 5 3600 11.48
+1162%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron 1020E by 1162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 1020E 1406
Ryzen 5 3600 17756
+1163%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron 1020E by 1163% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 11.48
Recency 20 January 2013 7 July 2019
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 5 3600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1020E in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 1020E is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 3600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1020E and Ryzen 5 3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1020E
Celeron 1020E
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Celeron 1020E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 16010 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1020E or Ryzen 5 3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.