Ultra 7 268V vs Celeron 1019Y

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1019Y
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.36
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
15.10
+4094%

Core Ultra 7 268V outperforms Celeron 1019Y by a whopping 4094% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3034460
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.4184.06
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$153no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s37 MHz
L1 cache128 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsArc 140V
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 268V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 268V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 15.10
Recency 1 April 2013 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron 1019Y has 70% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 268V, on the other hand, has a 4094.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 268V is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1019Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1019Y
Celeron 1019Y
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Core Ultra 7 268V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 1019Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 268V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1019Y or Core Ultra 7 268V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.