Atom N450 vs Celeron 1019Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1019Y
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.36
+177%
Atom N450
2009
1 core / 2 threads, 5 Watt
0.13

Celeron 1019Y outperforms Atom N450 by a whopping 177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1019Y and Atom N450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30493349
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.402.05
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)21 December 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$153$64

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1019Y and Atom N450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s533 MHz
L1 cache128 KB56 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1019Y and Atom N450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1019Y and Atom N450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1019Y and Atom N450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1019Y and Atom N450 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1019Y and Atom N450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600DDR2
Maximum memory size32 GB2 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1019Y and Atom N450 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1019Y 0.36
+177%
Atom N450 0.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1019Y 576
+184%
Atom N450 203

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 0.13
Recency 1 April 2013 21 December 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 5 Watt

Celeron 1019Y has a 176.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N450, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 1019Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N450 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1019Y and Atom N450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1019Y
Celeron 1019Y
Intel Atom N450
Atom N450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 1019Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 182 votes

Rate Atom N450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1019Y or Atom N450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.