i3-380UM vs Celeron 1017U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1017U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.95
+102%
Core i3-380UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.47

Celeron 1017U outperforms Core i3-380UM by a whopping 102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1017U and Core i3-380UM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25162931
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i3
Power efficiency5.292.47
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)1 October 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1017U and Core i3-380UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data10
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB3 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size94 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1017U and Core i3-380UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1017U and Core i3-380UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Celeron 1017U and Core i3-380UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1017U and Core i3-380UM are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1017U and Core i3-380UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1017U and Core i3-380UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1017U and Core i3-380UM.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1017U 0.95
+102%
i3-380UM 0.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1017U 1508
+102%
i3-380UM 745

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 1017U 263
+26.4%
i3-380UM 208

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 1017U 454
i3-380UM 471
+3.7%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron 1017U 2201
+46.5%
i3-380UM 1502

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron 1017U 4155
+19.7%
i3-380UM 3471

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron 1017U 1719
+17.5%
i3-380UM 1463

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron 1017U 46.38
i3-380UM 40.53
+14.4%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron 1017U 1
+17.1%
i3-380UM 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 0.47
Recency 1 July 2013 1 October 2010
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 18 Watt

Celeron 1017U has a 102.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 5.9% lower power consumption.

i3-380UM, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

The Celeron 1017U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-380UM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1017U and Core i3-380UM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1017U
Celeron 1017U
Intel Core i3-380UM
Core i3-380UM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 71 vote

Rate Celeron 1017U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 8 votes

Rate Core i3-380UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1017U or Core i3-380UM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.