i9-14900 vs Celeron 1007U

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1007U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.55
Core i9-14900
2024
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
31.43
+5615%

Core i9-14900 outperforms Celeron 1007U by a whopping 5615% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1007U and Core i9-14900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2846134
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.06
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.9544.09
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date20 January 2013 (11 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1007U and Core i9-14900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus typeDMIno data
Bus rate5 GT/s219 MHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size118 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1007U and Core i9-14900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1007U and Core i9-14900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 1007U and Core i9-14900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1007U and Core i9-14900 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1007U and Core i9-14900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1007U and Core i9-14900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 1007U and Core i9-14900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 1007U and Core i9-14900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1007U and Core i9-14900.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1007U 0.55
i9-14900 31.43
+5615%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1007U 839
i9-14900 48099
+5633%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 1007U 252
i9-14900 2902
+1052%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 1007U 421
i9-14900 17610
+4083%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron 1007U 1610
i9-14900 18728
+1063%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron 1007U 1
i9-14900 57
+4579%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Celeron 1007U 0.63
i9-14900 3.8
+503%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 31.43
Recency 20 January 2013 8 January 2024
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 1007U has 282.4% lower power consumption.

i9-14900, on the other hand, has a 5614.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Core i9-14900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1007U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 1007U is a notebook processor while Core i9-14900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1007U and Core i9-14900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1007U
Celeron 1007U
Intel Core i9-14900
Core i9-14900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 124 votes

Rate Celeron 1007U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 71 vote

Rate Core i9-14900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1007U or Core i9-14900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.