Ultra 9 386H vs Celeron 1007U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1007U
2013, $86
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.48
Core Ultra 9 386H
2026
16 cores / 16 threads, 25 Watt
17.63
+3573%

Core Ultra 9 386H outperforms Celeron 1007U by a whopping 3573% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3191431
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.1929.78
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Panther Lake (2026)
Release date20 January 2013 (13 years ago)5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 386H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Efficient-coresno data8
Low Power Efficient-coresno data4
Threads216
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeDMIno data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 386H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA2540
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 386H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 386H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 386H are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 386H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3LPDDR5X-8533, DDR5-7200
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz2.5 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 386H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 386H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over eDPno data3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 386H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX 12 Ultimate
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 386H.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 1007U 0.48
Ultra 9 386H 17.63
+3573%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 1007U 845
Samples: 757
Ultra 9 386H 30864
+3553%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 17.63
Recency 20 January 2013 5 January 2026
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron 1007U has 47.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 386H, on the other hand, has a 3572.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 1007U in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1007U
Celeron 1007U
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Core Ultra 9 386H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 149 votes

Rate Celeron 1007U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra 9 386H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 386H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.