Processor U300 vs Celeron 1005M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1005M
2013, $86
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.64
Processor U300
2023, $193
5 cores / 6 threads, 15 Watt
5.00
+681%

Processor U300 outperforms Celeron 1005M by a whopping 681% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30451431
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.44
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Raptor Lake-U
Power efficiency0.7714.06
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Raptor Lake-U (2023)
Release date1 July 2013 (12 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Celeron 1005M and Processor U300: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s55 MHz
L1 cache128 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Processor U300 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz)
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Processor U300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Processor U300.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes168

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 5.00
Integrated graphics card 0.72 4.32
Recency 1 July 2013 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 5
Threads 2 6
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Processor U300 has a 681% higher aggregate performance score, 500% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 150% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 133% lower power consumption.

The Intel Processor U300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 1005M in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 296 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 24 votes

Rate Processor U300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 1005M and Processor U300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.