Atom N270 vs Celeron 1005M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1005M and Atom N270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2601not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date1 July 2013 (10 years ago)1 March 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$44
Current price$36 (0.4x MSRP)$134 (3x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1005M and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus supportno data533 MHz
L1 cache128 KB56 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size94 mm226 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Atom N270 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors-
Quick Sync Video--
Clear Video--
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1 GHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Atom N270 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Atom N270.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 1005M 1101
+710%
Atom N270 136

Celeron 1005M outperforms Atom N270 by 710% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2013 1 March 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Cost $86 $44
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron 1005M and Atom N270. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and Atom N270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M
Intel Atom N270
Atom N270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 232 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 219 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1005M or Atom N270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.