Athlon XP 2600+ DTR vs Celeron 1005M
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2947 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Power efficiency | 0.77 | no data |
Designer | Intel | AMD |
Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Barton (2001−2004) |
Release date | 1 July 2013 (12 years ago) | January 2001 (24 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 1005M and Athlon XP 2600+ DTR basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 1.92 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | 94 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 63 million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 1005M and Athlon XP 2600+ DTR compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCPGA988 | A |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 68 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Athlon XP 2600+ DTR. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
My WiFi | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 1005M and Athlon XP 2600+ DTR technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Athlon XP 2600+ DTR are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Athlon XP 2600+ DTR. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Athlon XP 2600+ DTR integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
SDVO | + | no data |
CRT | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Athlon XP 2600+ DTR.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 68 Watt |
Celeron 1005M has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 490.9% more advanced lithography process, and 94.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 1005M and AMD Athlon XP 2600+ DTR. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 1005M is a notebook processor while Athlon XP 2600+ DTR is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.