FX-4150 vs C-60
Aggregate performance score
FX-4150 outperforms C-60 by a whopping 956% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3553 | 2199 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD C-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.84 | 0.84 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 22 August 2011 (14 years ago) | 23 October 2012 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
C-60 and FX-4150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on C-60 and FX-4150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-60 and FX-4150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz) | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-60 and FX-4150 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-60 and FX-4150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6290 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by C-60 and FX-4150.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.18 | 1.90 |
| Recency | 22 August 2011 | 23 October 2012 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 95 Watt |
C-60 has 956% lower power consumption.
FX-4150, on the other hand, has a 956% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD FX-4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD C-60 in performance tests.
Be aware that C-60 is a notebook processor while FX-4150 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
