Processor N200 vs C-30
Primary details
Comparing C-30 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2107 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD C-Series | Intel Alder Lake-N |
Power efficiency | no data | 24.50 |
Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $193 |
Detailed specifications
C-30 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 0.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on C-30 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-30 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 40 nm, 1.24-1.35V | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
C-30 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-30 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-30 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by C-30 and Processor N200.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 4 January 2011 | 3 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 6 Watt |
Processor N200 has an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between C-30 and Processor N200. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between C-30 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.