Opteron 4334 vs C-30
Primary details
Comparing C-30 and Opteron 4334 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD C-Series | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2010−2012) | Seoul (2012) |
| Release date | 9 November 2010 (13 years ago) | 4 December 2012 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
C-30 and Opteron 4334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 288 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 6144 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on C-30 and Opteron 4334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | C32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-30 and Opteron 4334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 40 nm, 1.24-1.35V | no data |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-30 and Opteron 4334 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-30 and Opteron 4334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 November 2010 | 4 December 2012 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 95 Watt |
C-30 has 955.6% lower power consumption.
Opteron 4334, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between C-30 and Opteron 4334. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that C-30 is a notebook processor while Opteron 4334 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between C-30 and Opteron 4334, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
