FX PRO-8800P vs C-30
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3639 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD C-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.47 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (14 years ago) | 2 June 2015 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
C-30 and FX PRO-8800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 250 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,100 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on C-30 and FX PRO-8800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-30 and FX PRO-8800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 40 nm, 1.24-1.35V | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-30 and FX PRO-8800P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-30 and FX PRO-8800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | Radeon R7 8CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by C-30 and FX PRO-8800P.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 2 June 2015 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 15 Watt |
C-30 has 66.7% lower power consumption.
FX PRO-8800P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD C-30 and AMD FX PRO-8800P. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
