Atom C3758 vs C-30

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

C-30
2011
1 core / 1 thread, 9 Watt
0.10

Atom C3758 outperforms C-30 by a whopping 2530% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking35981874
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.54
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD C-SeriesIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.474.44
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameOntario (2011−2012)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)15 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

C-30 and Atom C3758 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache64 KB448 KB
L2 cache512 KB16 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography40 nm14 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on C-30 and Atom C3758 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-30 and Atom C3758. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions40 nm, 1.24-1.35Vno data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

C-30 and Atom C3758 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-30 and Atom C3758 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-30 and Atom C3758. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR4: 2400
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6250no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by C-30 and Atom C3758.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

C-30 0.10
Atom C3758 2.63
+2530%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

C-30 Samples: 6 178
Atom C3758 Samples: 7 4614
+2492%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.10 2.63
Recency 4 January 2011 15 August 2017
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 25 Watt

C-30 has 177.8% lower power consumption.

Atom C3758, on the other hand, has a 2530% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Atom C3758 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD C-30 in performance tests.

Be aware that C-30 is a notebook processor while Atom C3758 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD C-30
C-30
Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 21 votes

Rate C-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors C-30 and Atom C3758, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.